This section responds into the concern » just just just What maybe you have discovered?» thus, just results that are representative your quest must be presented. The outcomes ought to be necessary for conversation.

Statistical guidelines

• Indicate the analytical tests used in combination with all relevant parameters: e.g., suggest and standard deviation (SD): 44% (±3); median and interpercentile range: 7 years (4.5 to 9.5 years).
• Use mean and deviation that is standard report ordinarily distributed information.
• Utilize median and range that is interpercentile report skewed information.
• For figures, utilize two significant digits unless more accuracy is important (2.08, maybe maybe not 2.07856444).
• Never ever utilize percentages for extremely samples that are small, «one away from two» really should not be changed by 50%.

But, understand that many journals provide the likelihood of incorporating Supporting Materials, therefore make use of them easily for information of secondary importance. In this manner, usually do not try to «hide» information in the hope of saving it for the subsequent paper. You may lose proof to strengthen your summary. If data are way too numerous, you should use those materials that are supplementary.

Utilize sub-headings to help keep link between the exact same kind together, which can be much easier to review and read. Quantity these sub-sections when it comes to ease of interior cross-referencing, but constantly considering the publisher’s Guide for Authors.

When it comes to data, choose an order that is logical tells an obvious tale and causes it to be and simple to know. Generally speaking, this is within the order that is same presented within the practices part.

An essential problem is you are presenting your results, so you cannot refer to others here that you must not include references in this section. In the event that you make reference to others, is really because you will be talking about your outcomes, and this needs to be contained in the Discussion area.divider|Because you might be talking about your outcomes, and also this needs to be contained in the Discussion part.divider if you reference other people, is

Write the Discussion

Right right Here you have to react to just what the outcomes suggest. Most likely it’s the section that is easiest to publish, however the most difficult area to have appropriate. The reason being it’s the many section that is important of article. right Here you receive the chance to offer your computer data. Remember that a huge variety of manuscripts are rejected since the Discussion is poor.

You will need to result in the Discussion corresponding to your total results, but don’t reiterate the outcome. Right right Here you will need to compare the posted outcomes by the colleagues with yours (using a few of the recommendations within the Introduction). Never ignore operate in disagreement with yours, in turn, you need to confront it and persuade the reader that you will be proper or better.

Look at the following tips:

1. Prevent statements that exceed just just what the outcomes can help.

2. Avoid unspecific expressions such as «higher temperature», «at a lesser rate», «highly significant». Quantitative information will always preferred (35єC, 0.5%, p reduce individual communications, try not to add unpublished findings, manuscripts submitted although not yet accepted for book, magazines that aren’t peer reviewed, grey literature, or articles maybe maybe maybe not posted in English.

You will find the most authoritative information for each journal’s policy on citations when you consult the journal’s Guide for Authors as I have mentioned. Generally speaking, you ought to reduce communications that are personal and start to become mindful as to just how you consist of unpublished findings. These would writingelites.net discount be required for some procedures, but start thinking about if they strengthen or weaken your paper. You might also start thinking about articles posted on research systems just before book, but think about balancing these citations with citations of peer-reviewed research. Whenever research that is citing languages apart from English, be familiar with the chance that not every person within the review process will talk the language of this cited paper and therefore it might be useful to look for a interpretation where feasible.

Any software can be used by you, such as for instance EndNote or Mendeley, to format and can include your sources when you look at the paper. Many journals have finally the chance to files that are download small the structure of this recommendations, enabling you to change it out immediately. Additionally, Elsevier’s Your Paper your path system waves strict formatting needs for the original distribution of a manuscript so long as it includes all of the crucial elements being presented right right here.

Result in the guide list additionally the in-text citation conform strictly into the design provided when you look at the Guide for Authors. Understand that presentation associated with the recommendations within the proper structure is the duty for the writer, maybe maybe not the editor. Checking the structure is generally a big work for the editors. Make their work easier in addition they shall appreciate your time and effort.

Finally, check the annotated following:

• Spelling of writer names
• 12 months of magazines
• Usages of «et al.»
• Punctuation
• Whether all sources are included

In my own next article, i am going to provide methods for composing the manuscript, authorship, and just how to create a cover letter that is compelling. Stay tuned!divider

Recommendations and Acknowledgements

I’ve based this paper from the materials distributed towards the attendees of several courses. It really is influenced by numerous Guides for Authors of Elsevier journals. A few of this given info is additionally showcased in Elsevier’s Publishing Connect tutorials. In addition, i’ve consulted a few webpages: http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/, www.physics.ohio-state.edu/

I do want to acknowledge Dr. Christiane Barranguet, Executive Publisher of Aquatic Sciences at Elsevier, on her continuous help. And I also want to thank Dr. Alison Bert, Editor-in-Chief of Elsevier Connect; without her support, this show will have been impractical to finish.

Related Tales

In this brand new series — “How to get ready a Manuscript for Overseas Journals” — a practiced editor provides advice to enhance your likelihood of acceptance

Students writes concerning the motivation behind their model for earthquake forecast – and exactly just what he discovered on their (“tedious but well worth it”) journey to book

Whatever they don’t constantly inform you before you subscribe for graduate college

The perfect research system you envision just isn’t exactly just exactly what it’s

Journal editors expose the very best reasons a manuscript gets posted

Tips for Authors through the Publishing Connect Training Webcasts Channel

A log editor reveals the utmost effective reasons numerous manuscripts don’t ensure it is to the review process that is peer